Downtime + reactive maintenance cycles
Failures repeat because event history, work orders, and utilization signals aren’t analyzed together.
Failures repeat because event history, work orders, and utilization signals aren’t analyzed together.
Planning relies on inconsistent inputs; forecast error isn’t tracked by the right hierarchies.
Multiple systems and spreadsheets create conflicting KPIs and slow decisions.
Teams spend time explaining problems instead of getting an actionable risk queue.
Failure patterns, MTBF/MTTR drivers, and early warning signals tied to work-order actions.
Forecast baselines, error metrics, bias tracking, and conversion into buffers and service-level targets.
OEE-style views, throughput, downtime reasons, and constraint visibility for weekly cadence.
Semantic model, definitions, freshness checks, and adoption playbook for operators and leaders.
Architecture + roadmap + MVP plan (plant/asset class scope)
Curated models (assets, maintenance events, production, planning hierarchies)
Dashboards for plant + leadership cadence (exception-first)
Model evaluation + monitoring approach (accuracy, drift, overrides)
Real-Time IoT sensor data, historical maintenance logs, asset information(make, model and specifications) and environmental or operational conditions.
Establishing the asset hierarchy, event model, and KPIs so telemetry and maintenance data becomes actionable.
Typically 4–8 weeks for a scoped asset class or single plant.
Exception-first dashboards, named KPI owners, and embedding reviews into weekly operating cadence.
Improved OEE , faster interventions, increased forecast accuracy and reduced manual reporting effort.