Fraud detection without investigation clarity
Signals exist but aren’t routed into a prioritised workflow with explainable alerts.
Signals exist but aren’t routed into a prioritised workflow with explainable alerts.
Portfolio monitoring lacks stable definitions and driver visibility.
Teams spend time compiling evidence instead of improving controls.
Leaders need controlled assistants with permissions, logging, and evaluation.
Rules + statistical/ML signals, alert routing, and investigation-friendly outputs.
Portfolio views, driver decomposition, thresholds, and drift monitoring.
Governed metric definitions, consistent calculations, and evidence-ready reporting.
Assistants grounded in approved sources with role-based access, logs, and approvals.
Architecture + roadmap + MVP plan (one fraud/risk/compliance stream)
Curated models (transactions/events, customer/account, product, risk attributes)
Dashboards for risk + compliance cadence (alerts, exceptions, evidence)
Evaluation + monitoring approach (accuracy, drift, explainability, audit trail)
Use RAG over approved sources, enforce role-based access, log all interactions, and restrict actions through controlled tools and approvals.
Detecting unusual patterns quickly using rules + statistical/ML signals, then routing alerts into prioritised investigation workflows.
We implement evaluation reports, drift monitoring, and documented decision logic so risk teams can review and audit outcomes.
It can be when designed with encryption, access controls, audit logging, residency rules, and governance aligned to regulatory obligations.
4–8 weeks for one fraud/risk workflow or one compliance reporting stream, depending on access and approvals.