Budget vs actual vs committed isn’t unified
Forecasting is late because commitments and change exposure aren’t visible in one place.
Forecasting is late because commitments and change exposure aren’t visible in one place.
Pending COs age without escalation; small variances compound until EAC moves suddenly.
EAC forecasting with drivers; estimate vs actual patterns to improve future bids and reduce leakage.
Standard cost codes/WBS mapping, KPI definitions, data quality checks, and audit-ready reporting.
One view for budget, actuals, committed, EAC trend, and change exposure—built for weekly action.
Near-miss patterns, audit completion, training compliance, and safety risk signals by project and contractor.
EAC forecasting with drivers; estimate vs actual patterns to improve future bids and reduce leakage.
Standard cost codes/WBS mapping, KPI definitions, data quality checks, and audit-ready reporting.
Controls data model (cost codes/WBS, schedule, commitments, COs, safety)
Cockpit dashboards (Exec / Project Controls / Finance) with exception-first design
Forecasting logic + monitoring approach (stability, overrides, drivers)
Governance pack: KPI definitions, access patterns, validation checks
By detecting early signals—cost drift, schedule slippage, and safety leading indicators—and routing them into an action queue before issues compound.
Connecting BIM metadata to project controls so model elements become measurable in progress, cost, and safety context.
Yes. We integrate current systems first and modernize selectively only if required for reliability or audit.
1–3 projects, standardized cost codes/WBS, a controls cockpit, and a weekly cadence with named owners.
4–12 weeks depending on system access, mapping complexity, and KPI alignment.