Monitoring + incident response (SLA-based)
Pipeline failures, refresh issues, integration breaks—triaged and resolved with clear escalation.
Pipeline failures, refresh issues, integration breaks—triaged and resolved with clear escalation.
Freshness/completeness checks, anomaly alerts, and root-cause workflows to protect trust.
Controlled changes, measure reviews, RLS/access updates, and prevention of KPI drift.
Testing, regression checks, versioning, and safe deployments—so changes don’t break reporting.
Capacity tuning, query optimization, cost visibility, and guardrails.
Enhancement pipeline for new KPIs/sources + adoption cadence so usage grows.
SLA model + severity matrix + response targets
Monitoring dashboards + alerting + runbooks
KPI governance workflows + change approvals
Monthly reliability + usage report (what broke, what improved, what’s next)
Ongoing operations after go-live: monitoring, incident response, data quality checks, access support, KPI/semantic governance, and a structured enhancement backlog.
Yes. Response and resolution targets by severity, coverage windows, and escalation paths.
Semantic governance, documented definitions, controlled deployments, regression testing, and approvals.
Both. We can embed engineers/BI developers, but recommend outcome-based pods with SLAs and cadence.
Monitoring + evaluation, role-based permissions, audit logs, and approved knowledge sources—so outputs and actions remain controlled and reviewable.